return to CDB main page

Animal Welfare Act 2007 bans tail docking

home
 contact us

Report Tail Damage

Report hygiene, health, medical, rescue or social problems
Why dock tails
What is tail docking and dewclaw removal
The case for docking
Video of pups being docked
Frequently Asked Questions
Pain felt by puppies
Tail damage reports
Swedish tail damage report

Damage evidence
UK Boxer 1
UK Boxer 2
UK Spaniel
UK GSP
Swedish Boxer
Undocked breed
Undocked mongrel

The UK CDB
A potted history
Animal Welfare Bill campaign

Reform of VSA campaign
List of traditionally Docked Breeds
Political Advertisements

What UK vets say
Many UK vets want to dock
One docking vet disciplined
RCVS admit defeat
Red herrings!
RCVS guidelines
RCVS hypocrisy
RCVS working party
Vet questionnaire
BSAVA vet questionnaire
Vet advice to dock Boxers

Docking worldwide
America
Australia
Canada
Europe

New Zealand


Links
Pictures of long tailed Scandinavian Boxers
Major docked breed sites
Other related canine sites
Opponents of docking sites

Site opposing European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals
Archives


Contact the CDB
to contact us


       

RCVS Disciplinary Hearing
Clears Docking Vet

The first UK veterinary surgeon to face disciplinary action for docking puppies tails was cleared of all charges of disgraceful professional conduct on Friday 8 September, 1995.

Marshall Dale, of Hockley Essex, was alleged to have performed the procedure on at least six occasions for cosmetic reasons, in breach of a code of conduct laid down by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Mr Dale, a practising vet for 26 years, acknowledged docking Yorkshire Terrier, Old English Sheepdogs and Giant Schnauzer puppies at his surgery, but said it was for legitimate welfare reasons.

The four day hearing was the first since the college, which sets professional standards, issued a code of conduct in 1993, aimed at banning the procedure except in restricted circumstances.

Mr Dale faced nine charges of disgraceful professional conduct and could have been struck off the professional register. After the hearing, Mr Dale said that he felt "delighted. This has been hanging over me for six months and it has been a terrible strain for my family. I don't think I would have felt worse if I had been accused of murder". Mr Dale added that the hearing had failed to resolve the confusion surrounding the ethics of docking. "It has been left to the grass root vets to sort out, which is not satisfactory".

Simon Wheatley, Mr Dales Council accused the college of bringing the case because of political expediency. "The issue had been ducked by the Government and the College, so it now falls to the individual vet to resolve an issue which is seen as so important, but which has been handled politically so maladroitly" Mr Wheatley said that Mr Dale had docked only for acceptable prophylactic reasons. The Yorkshire Terriers for instance, belonged to a breeder who mainly sold dogs to older women. "It is a fact of life that ladies of high reputation do not think it appropriate to concern themselves with the rear end of the Yorkshire Terrier", he said. "There is therefore, a high risk of them suffering problems connected with soreness and fouling".

Simon Wheatley also explained why Marshal Dale docked the Schnauzer. "This is a very small numerical breed. Mr Dale went through his books and read up and tried to find out the size of the breed. He learned how the breed had long thin sparsely coated tails like the Irish Wolfhounds. He deduced that there was a possibility of injury, like the Irish Wolfhound. He explained how he has had two Wolfhounds in his practice who had to be docked because of tail end splitting. They are very hard to heal and eventually had to be docked as adults. Can he be deemed to be wrong"?

James Badenoch, QC. for the college had argued that docking was performed only for reasons of tradition. "Tail docking belongs to history. Breeders will have to realise that the tail belongs to the dog", he said.

The defence costs which were in excess of £25,000.00, were covered by the Council of Docked Breeds from their Legal Fighting Fund.

 

 

 
Most material on this web site is copyright the Council of Docked Breeds (UK) 1991 / 2007© and all worldwide rights are reserved. Material from this site may not be reprinted or published in any format (print, digital, CD, electronic or web site) or where a charge is made in whole or in part, without express written permission from the Council of Docked Breeds (UK).