All content free to use for non profit organisations
Docking worldwide
America
We believe that the following extract proves that the minority desire to ban tail docking is alive in the United States. Ignored, groups such as this will gain strength and persuade the authorities that their unsubstantiated claims are valid and widely accepted. Legislative changes restricting docking may slip through unnoticed, lumped in with the banning of other practices which are perhaps valid in the name of welfare, thus providing little or no opposition. If you support the docking option, you need to be prepared to campaign for its retention and to make your voice heard. Quote starts: Position Statement:Cosmetic Surgery or Surgery to Correct 'Vices'The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights is opposed to various surgeries done to meet 'breed standards' or to correct so-called vices. Procedures such as ear cropping, tail docking or 'debarking' in dogs, or declawing in cats are unacceptable because the suffering and disfigurement they cause the animal are not offset by any benefits to the animal. If such a procedure can be shown to be necessary for medical or humane reasons, then it is permissible. The 'breed standards' for dogs must be altered to allow the animals to be shown without being surgically mutilated. End of Quote Please do not be fooled by the apparent get out clause "If such a procedure can be shown to be necessary for medical or humane reasons, then it is permissible". This will be interpreted as the tail docking procedure only being allowed when an adult dog has injured its long tail. This group is plainly under the misconception that tail docking is merely "cosmetic surgery". Should you wish to contact them or see their full statement, here are their details: Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights P.O. Box 208 Davis, California 95617-0208, U.S.A. Voice phone: 530.759.8106 Facsimile: 530.759.8116 Internet, e-mail: AVAR@igc.org Internet, web site: http://AVAR.org
Current tail docking situation in EU Countries
We are attempting to list every EU Country and entries are believed to be correct as at 5th July 2010CountryBanned?Exceptions?Can show?Albania Andorra Armenia Austria YessomeYes *Azerbaijan Belgium YesBosnia and Herzegovina NoYes Bulgaria NoYesCroatia YesCyprus YesYesCzech Republic YesNoDenmark YesNoEstonia YesYes Finland YesNoFrance NoYesGeorgia Germany YesNoGreece No **NoYesHungary NoYesIceland NoYesIreland NoYesItaly NoYesLatvia Yes?No?Liechtenstein Lithuania YesLuxembourg YesYesMalta YesMoldova NoYesMonaco Montenegro Netherlands YesNoNorway YesNoPoland NoYesPortugal YesYesRomania NoYesRussia NoYesSan Marino NoYesSerbia NoYesSlovakia YesSlovenia NoYesSpain PartYesSweden YesSwitzerland YesThe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia YesTurkey Ukraine NoYesUnited Kingdom YessomeNoNorthern IrelandNoYes * = can only show from Countries where it is allowedNo** = it is banned in greece but the ban is ignoredPart - Banned in some parts, not in others
Docking
worldwide
America
We believe that the following extract proves that the minority desire to ban tail docking is alive in the United States. Ignored, groups such as this will gain strength and persuade the authorities that their unsubstantiated claims are valid and widely accepted. Legislative changes restricting docking may slip through unnoticed, lumped in with the banning of other practices which are perhaps valid in the name of welfare, thus providing little or no opposition. If you support the docking option, you need to be prepared to campaign for its retention and to make your voice heard. Quote starts: Position Statement:Cosmetic Surgery or Surgery to Correct 'Vices'The Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights is opposed to various surgeries done to meet 'breed standards' or to correct so-called vices. Procedures such as ear cropping, tail docking or 'debarking' in dogs, or declawing in cats are unacceptable because the suffering and disfigurement they cause the animal are not offset by any benefits to the animal. If such a procedure can be shown to be necessary for medical or humane reasons, then it is permissible. The 'breed standards' for dogs must be altered to allow the animals to be shown without being surgically mutilated. End of Quote Please do not be fooled by the apparent get out clause "If such a procedure can be shown to be necessary for medical or humane reasons, then it is permissible". This will be interpreted as the tail docking procedure only being allowed when an adult dog has injured its long tail. This group is plainly under the misconception that tail docking is merely "cosmetic surgery". Should you wish to contact them or see their full statement, here are their details: Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights P.O. Box 208 Davis, California 95617-0208, U.S.A. Voice phone: 530.759.8106 Facsimile: 530.759.8116 Internet, e-mail: AVAR@igc.org Internet, web site: http://AVAR.org
Current tail docking situation in EU
Countries
We are attempting to list every EU Country and entries are believed to be correct as at 5th July 2010CountryBanned?Exceptions?Can show?Albania Andorra Armenia Austria YessomeYes *Azerbaijan Belgium YesBosnia and Herzegovina NoYes Bulgaria NoYesCroatia YesCyprus YesYesCzech Republic YesNoDenmark YesNoEstonia YesYes Finland YesNoFrance NoYesGeorgia Germany YesNoGreece No **NoYesHungary NoYesIceland NoYesIreland NoYesItaly NoYesLatvia Yes?No?Liechtenstein Lithuania YesLuxembourg YesYesMalta YesMoldova NoYesMonaco Montenegro Netherlands YesNoNorway YesNoPoland NoYesPortugal YesYesRomania NoYesRussia NoYesSan Marino NoYesSerbia NoYesSlovakia YesSlovenia NoYesSpain PartYesSweden YesSwitzerland YesThe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia YesTurkey Ukraine NoYesUnited Kingdom YessomeNoNorthern IrelandNoYes * = can only show from Countries where it is allowedNo** = it is banned in greece but the ban is ignoredPart - Banned in some parts, not in others